Ultiworld globe logo

How We Practice: Scrimmages vs. Drills

by in Opinion with 2 Comments

An orange cone marking the corner of an endzone.Yes, we’re talking about practice. One thing every even semi-serious ultimate team has in common is that they practice.  But there are countless different philosophies on what a practice is meant to accomplish. Some clubs focus on conditioning, some on disc skills, some on fundamentals; the purpose and execution of practice varies greatly from team to team.

We want to begin looking at the different ways teams prepare in our new recurring series, How We Practice. Each article in the series will explore some aspect of a typical ultimate practice with the intention of opening up a larger discussion on the topic at hand. Our first installment will take a look at the ways practices are split between scrimmages and drills.

Ultimate practices are generally divided into three distinct segments: warm ups, drills, and scrimmages. Every team I’ve ever played for followed this same basic routine — excluding the more casual ones that skipped straight to the fun part — but the intended benefits of each portion are rarely discussed. Assuming that warming up is something we all accept as a necessary aspect of practice, what factors should be considered when determining how the rest of a practice is used?

Warm ups are most commonly followed by drills. Sometimes the two are even integrated into a single segment, where the drills are gradually increased in intensity as the players begin to loosen up. The purpose of nearly every drill is to ingrain some fundamental aspect of ultimate in the participants. The complexity of skills being acquired varies greatly.

A simple ‘marking drill‘ helps developing players establish basic components of their game while something like a ‘continuation drill‘ isolates an important scenario and helps build comfort with it through repetition. Drills can be very valuable when it comes to developing specific facets of one’s ultimate game but they are often limited by their narrow focus.

Most drills simulate specific aspects of a game but not the transition between them. They are great for teaching fundamentals but can limit a player’s ability to develop a feel for the flow of the game. It can be particularly difficult for rookies — even though they arguably benefit most from drills — to understand how a drill applies to in-game situations. Personally, I recall it taking me weeks to figure out how a dump drill with a continuation swing applied to games because I simply hadn’t seen that situation arise enough times at full speed to know what we were trying to simulate. What’s more, drills are often lined up for in a way that only vaguely looks like an on-field scenario — a very specific one at that — making it difficult to integrate what is being taught into a player’s skill set.

Does this justify spending more time scrimmaging? Not really. Scrimmages are often less beneficial to the developing players who need to learn the most. Simply put, players with strong disc skills tend to get more touches in games, limiting the chance for newer players to get reps that they would be forced to take in drills. Focusing on scrimmaging too much can stunt the progress of a young ultimate player.

There is also the issue of limited competition. Particularly for college teams, where depth is usually a major issue, teams are regularly forced to decide between splitting up their top lines and having them play intact against their weaker teammates. Most teams put their best players on offense (that’s not universally true but is a prevalent strategy) meaning that the choice is between developing cohesion as a unit and practicing against defenders that aren’t as strong as the ones they will see at tournaments.

This is by no means a comprehensive analysis of how practice time is divided and it is not meant to be. That’s why we want to pose this question to the community at large: how does your team practice? Leave us comments on how do you decide what time is devoted to drilling or scrimmaging. We are interested to see how philosophies, styles and approaches differ from team to team and hope that by starting a discussion, we can learn from each other in order to start practicing for effectively and efficiently.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user nzbuu.

Tagged , ,

About Wes Cronk

Wesley Cronk is the Vice President of Business Development of Ultiworld. Originally from West Palm Beach, Florida, he started playing ultimate in high school and split his college ultimate between the University of Florida and New York University. He has played open club with Vicious Cycle (Gainesville) and Fox Trot Swag Team Unity (New York). He currently lives in Brooklyn, NY. You can reach him by email (wes@ultiworld.com) or on Twitter (@wescronk).

View all posts by Wes Cronk →

Related Posts

  • Brummie

    Hi. I’m the coach of the GB Open team that made the final at WUGC. We spent the vast majority of practice time in drills that mimic game situations.

    The kind of “skills drills” that were referred to above (such as dumps, continuation etc) probably made up less than 25% of our practice time (probably closer to 40% at the start of the season, down to 5% or less – i.e. as part of a warm up – just before Worlds).

    Traditional, “games” of 7-on-7 ultimate probably less than 20% (although the closer we got to Worlds, the more that changed).

    The rest of the time we are drilling game situations. So, for example, we set up in line trap, and play until we get the disc to the other sideline. Or we start with a completed huck, and try to score from there (rather than the pretty endzone drill that most people practice). Or take one of our weakest throwers and give them the disc in a messy setup (simulating a call being made while we were in flow), to get them confident in those situations. Maybe we set up a zone, and every time the cup gets beaten we’d have a phoney call that meant the disc had to go back, forcing the throwers to beat the zone over and over again, or we’d mimic having already got the disc through the cup and try to prevent getting trapped again. Effectively we worked hard at the “transitional phase” of the game, i.e. the bits that most teams don’t work on.

    What do I mean by this? Well, let’s imagine you have a pull play that ends with a huck, and an endzone 7-on-7 drill. If you catch that huck short of the endzone, do you wait for everyone to set up so you can run your drill? You may get in trouble if you do. We spent time working on the boundaries of where our plays/patterns started and stopped, so that we could play seamlessly. I’m not saying that the results were perfect… but what we did do was get into everyone’s heads what they should be trying to do when things don’t work as planned.

    Adaptability is crucial in ultimate, I don’t think you can teach people how to do it, but what you can do is have your team buy in to doing things one way or another. For GB, one example was that if we got an isolation in the endzone, we’d throw it, every time. You can see this from the videos from WUGC. I certainly think that our approach, with such a young squad, contributed to our (questionable) success.

  • Keith R

    In my experience, another important value of scrimmage is to keep players engaged. A lot of players need it to keep them mentally involved in practice. For college teams developing new players, keeping them playing the game and having fun is a vital part of retention. You have to balance how much you scrimmage because it is fun.

    I think, without time constraints, you would actually probably best be served by two “scrimmage” portions, probably in a #-pull setting (same team starts the points on defense, limited number of offensive possessions) and the focus is on the drills you did. For if you did a marking drill, you would do a 3-pull scrimmage with the focus on marking. Maybe you do a point for every break throw and two points for a handblock or an extra point for break throw score. After the scrimmage, you move onto the next major drill and practice concept, and then practice it again.

    I think this achieves a lot of balance, keeps players engaged, and allows them to focus on applying skills from drills. I think you ALWAYS want to draw focus into your scrimmages into certain elements. Finding ways to do that is hard, but it can help a lot.

Find us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook