Ultiworld globe logo

The Faulty Logic Of The Triple Crown Tour — And An Easy Fix

by in Analysis with 12 Comments

I am a big fan of USA Ultimate. I’ve been playing ultimate for over ten years and USA Ultimate is a huge part of why playing has been such a fantastic experience for me. Moreover, coming from the nonprofit world, I know how hard it can be to run a large member organization with limited resources and often times, unlimited demands.

However, the underlying logic of the Triple Crown Tour doesn’t seem to make sense.

Here’s what we’ve been told.

The goal is to grow the overall fan base of ultimate, particularly among outsiders.

Not a huge priority for me, personally, but I know a lot of people have been pushing for it. So, I get it.

You do this by finding a way to showcase the best ultimate on a more regular basis.

Again, makes sense. So far, so good.

Increase the number of tournaments where the best teams in the country are playing.

Nope. You lost me. Why? Tournaments simply aren’t particularly effective ways to showcase ultimate.

Tournaments, by their very nature, require a gargantuan amount of field space and that usually means that they are far away from any urban hub (usually 30-40 minutes outside of a major city) and don’t have any sort of fan-friendly venue for single games. Nothing with stadium-seating, a PA system, bathrooms, vendor space, and all the other amenities that make watching the sport really comfortable for spectators.

The format means a stronger likelihood of inclement weather because it takes up an entire weekend. And finally, you can’t market the teams that are going to be in the finals of a tournament because…well…you don’t know who they’re going to be until late Sunday morning.

When the American Ultimate Disc League and NexGen were founded, they realized this out of the gate.

A big part of their shared vision was to showcase the game of ultimate. They wanted to put asses in the seats. And what was the biggest decision they made about the game? They changed the format. They moved to single game showcase events instead of multi-day, multi-game, multi-team tournaments.

Talk to any player from the AUDL last year and they’ll tell you it was by far the biggest difference from playing club — more so than field size, refs, rules, branding or anything else. And the AUDL did it specifically because they felt it was the only way to draw fans to the events. The games were in spectator friendly locations with spectator friendly venues at spectator friendly times.

And the result? They got asses in the seats. Or to be fair, they got more asses in the seats than club ultimate ever has.

Just to hammer this home, last year, the AUDL had a smaller budget, less skilled players, and fewer pre-existing fans than USA Ultimate. Yet they managed to draw more spectators in their first game in Philadelphia than any other game of club ultimate in the last 10 years.

The ultimate community has talked a lot about the nuances of paid versus unpaid players, new field sizes, altered rules, roster sizes, and a wide variety of other details, but thinking about USA Ultimate versus the professional leagues is fundamentally a question about the format of the game.

USA Ultimate seemed to miss the main learning from the AUDL and NexGen. If you want to showcase the game of ultimate to the outside world, you have to change the format.

If it were up to me, I think USA Ultimate has an easy answer in front of them and it involves one simple change to club ultimate: I wouldn’t play the club finals game in Sarasota each year.

I would make Nationals the final, community-wide, multi-day tournament experience that determines the two best teams in each division. Then, those two teams play in a single-game showcase championship event in some major ultimate hub in the following 2-4 weeks.

There are obviously some challenges to this. It would mean additional cost, travel, and coordination for the players & USA Ultimate. Maybe these are insurmountable, but if it can be done then in return you get to hype up the biggest single game of the year for a month, analyze all the individual & strategic match-ups, get healthier teams that aren’t coming off of 3 days of playing and you could host it in rotating cities where there are sizable ultimate communities, fantastic fan-friendly venues, and potential fan bases ripe for growth.

It’s easy to get defensive when you feel threatened (and make no mistake about it, USAU’s monopoly on the most competitive league in the country is no longer a given), but if USAU is going to thrive, they need to be willing to learn from what’s happening around them.

Tagged , ,

About Brandon Silverman

Brandon Silverman has been playing club ultimate for over 10 years, including six trips to Club Nationals. He's played for Pike, Truckstop, Southpaw, and, most recently, the Ghosts out of Boston.

View all posts by Brandon Silverman →

Related Posts

  • http://twitter.com/digimoral Jo S

    Great analysis! Nice angle from which most people probably haven’t looked at the issue (I know I haven’t ;) ). I’m not sure if 2-4 weeks time would be enough for the final teams to organize everything, but it’s a better format than Tripple Crown in my opinion with a more managable load on elite teams and even an improved Nationals final game.

  • Nick

    What would also be cool – 3 game series between the finals teams over 3 days

  • Ken

    “I’m not paying any attention to that other stuff…” – Tom Crawford
    http://youtu.be/ratgeR_xP2g?t=4m11s

  • Shu C

    “If it were up to me, I think USA Ultimate has an easy answer in front of them and it involves one simple change to club ultimate: I wouldn’t play the club finals game in Sarasota each year.”

    Totally agree. Might not be the best example, but Japan Ultimate already does this for the All Japan Championships. They have preliminary regional tournaments to determine the finalists that enter Nationals, which is held in Fuji City (a 3 hour drive from Tokyo). They then hold the Finals matches (both men and women) on a different date, in a stadium within Tokyo. I’m never in the country at the time (late October) to actually see the matches, but I’ve had multiple friends go and watch because there’s seating and they know who’s playing who.

  • Chris

    I like this in theory, but I think the only way that could work is if USAU were able to subsidize the travel costs of the finals teams. A multi-day event would also be hard, because those players most likely just took extra time off work for the nationals tournament, and likely regionals as well.
    Also, Nationals likely won’t be in Sarasota this year anyway. The contract with the Polo Fields is up and it is my understanding that the tournament has been put out to bid. I went down to watch this year and the Polo Fields were amazing…but it is spot on that the venue is not convenient for fans to get to, which was really obvious since the vast majority of people watching games, even finals, were players from teams that were there anyway or players from teams playing in the nearby Ultiamte Invite Championships.

    • Chris

      Oops, I read that wrong…I realize you weren’t saying the actual final should be multiple days. So I guess that part can be directed @0ed2a798b10934478b32b203da0c715d:disqus

  • Dave

    As long as the travel cost can in some way be subsidized/absorbed, I’d be in favor of holding the Club Finals in a pre-determined location that’s more spectator friendly. I’m probably not going to fly or even drive more than 2-3 hours to see the Championship game, but I’d certainly pay to stream it live or encourage my local Disc organization to host a viewing party at a bar.
    Our current club season already runs into a time when major TV outlets are not looking for additional sports programming – the club series takes place during baseball pennat races/playoffs, the start of college and pro football and Nationals takes place right at the start of the NBA season. Having a one-off Championship game televised live might be an easier sell than selling coverage of an entire tournament to a major sports network. A little off topic, but the thought of a stand alone championship game got me back to thinking about potential tv viewership.

    • Brandon

      My thoughts as well…especially because it can be sold to an outlet specifically as the championship game between the two best teams in the country.

  • James

    Single showcase games are nice, but as long as USAU is committed to a structure where the lower division teams are not completely separate from the elite, it will need the number of games that tournaments provide.

  • Sherri Rose

    makes sense, yes. i get it. just sux 4 me cuz as much as i looove Ultimate, i wouldn’t (couldn’t) drive 21hrs for ONE game (evn if it were the championship game) or fly 3000mi if it weren’t a 3 or 4 day tourney. (drove 21hrs for both the club, and college nationals this past yr, as well as flew 2 Sarasota in Oct/12) all were not ‘viewing-or-spectator friendly’, no. (no stands – which, honestly wasn’t such a big deal since there were next 2 no… spectators. :o and, no refs, which, was by far the most frustrating thing in the entire world. (oh my goodness. can they plz PLAY? (sooo many stoppages. :( ) but, i do realize, that yes. my take on all this is quite likely.. probably just me. O.o. (bring elite/pro-Ulti 2 Canada plz? :)

  • Dan

    This is a great idea.

  • Ben

    Brandon,

    Still think this is an awesome idea. Would be tricky to pull off with the current club season (given weather + football), but I’d imagine TV networks would bite if it was pre or post football season.

Find us on Twitter
Find us on Facebook