Ultiworld globe logo

More On The T-Town Spike: A Response To Central Florida Coach Andrew Roca

by in Opinion with 10 Comments

On Skyd Magazine this morning, Andrew Roca, the head coach of Central Florida, wrote an op-ed about the T-Town Spike incident. The piece responds to commentary here on Ultiworld about the larger implications of the layout, spike, and minor scuffle that followed.

Roca points out that the video clip “failed to show…the events that followed” the incident, instead showing just the heated moment without context.

“It did not display the ensuing apology and explanation from Chris Browning to me about his intent,” he wrote. “Apologies and hand-shaking were also shared between Brawley, Chris, and Mike Hickson.”

Roca went on to make the point that “what everyone has claimed to be an aggressive case of bad spirit’ in a game of college ultimate turned exactly into the opposite: a heated moment…readily diffused with apologies and handshakes.”

It’s a well-argued piece and worth reading in full. But Roca misses a key point in his argument — this is not about the ability of players to calm down after a heated moment; it’s about enforcing rules and ensuring that we do not tacitly allow dangerous bids or disrespectful actions (e.g. spiking on or near an opponent) to be an accepted part of the sport.

In our podcast this week, we discussed how other sports handle similar situations. There are many tools at the disposal of referees faced with situations where competition “overheats” and there is a particularly hard foul or unsportsmanlike conduct: flagrant fouls, fines, ejections, yardage penalties, penalty boxes, etc. Of course, in an observed game, there are Team and Player Misconduct Fouls (which no doubt would have been given out in this situation).

I believe that if ultimate is to continue to progress as a legitimate sport, it is not good enough to accept incidents like what happened at T-Town. Of course players are going to have unsportsmanlike moments, as they do in all sports. But there are penalties for those moments for a reason. It can be literally detrimental to the players safety.

In basketball, a hard shove from behind on a player going up for a layup is always going to be at least a flagrant, and potentially an ejection; fouls like that are dangerous. Often times, you’ll even see the perpetrator helping up the player he just fouled. That doesn’t excuse the foul.

If there are going to continue to be high-level, physical tournaments played without observers, there should be a better way to police games. USA Ultimate could easily use available game video to apply PMFs, suspensions, or other penalties they decide upon. This will immediately discourage this behavior (much like observers discourage it), which should be the goal.

Furthermore, as more and more game video becomes available and interest in the sport continues to grow, we have to start thinking about the implications of our on-field behavior and rule enforcement more than ever before. There is no place for unpunished flagrant fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct in legitimate sports. We shouldn’t teach younger players to play like that, and we shouldn’t want fans to see it as an accepted aspect of our game.

Yes, what happened at T-Town was a minor incident along the spectrum of dangerous bids, aggressive spikes, and fights. And kudos to the players for quickly resolving the issue and continuing the game without incident. But the argument that spirit prevailed doesn’t really hold water — good spirit means that the bid and the spike never happened.

Of course there will be moments in the heat of competition when spirit will break down. That’s why there are rules and penalties in place. There should be an increased emphasis on enforcing those penalties at tournaments without observers.

Tagged , , , , , ,

About Charlie Eisenhood

Charlie Eisenhood is the editor-in-chief of Ultiworld. He started playing Ultimate in Albuquerque, New Mexico as a high school student. He captained NYU's college team and has played Open Club with Sweet Roll (Albuquerque) and Medicine Men (Baltimore). He lives in Brooklyn. You can reach him by email (charlie@ultiworld.com) or on Twitter (@ceisenhood).

View all posts by Charlie Eisenhood →

Related Posts

  • guest

    Do you know what my favorite part of the T-Town Spike video is, Brawley Adams just getting up and walking away after he gets spiked on. Do you know what else would be great, more coverage of the college season (can we get previews of all the regions?) and less about incidents like this that don’t really matter. I encourage you to re-read Roca’s article because I think you missed the point.

    • http://www.ultiworld.com/ Charlie Eisenhood

      While taken as a singular incident, I suppose this “doesn’t really matter.” But it brings up a broader point that DOES really matter.

    • peter

      Do you know what my least favorite part of the spike video is? All of it. Unnecessary bid followed by spike at a player followed by two hand shove from another player. I think you miss the point. This is not acceptable. Charlie gets that is a minor incident, but he also sees the value in bringing attention to it. This type of publicity will make a difference.
      “Yes, what happened at T-Town was a minor incident along the spectrum of
      dangerous bids, aggressive spikes, and fights. And kudos to the players
      for quickly resolving the issue and continuing the game without
      incident. But the argument that spirit prevailed doesn’t really hold
      water — good spirit means that the bid and the spike never happened.”

  • Nicky

    “It’s a well-argued piece and worth reading in full. But Roca misses a key point in his argument — this is not about the ability of players to calm down after a heated moment; it’s about enforcing rules and ensuring that we do not tacitly allow dangerous bids or disrespectful actions (e.g. spiking on or near an opponent) to be an accepted part of the sport.”

    I think that his key-point is more important than your key-point. (I don’t think he missed your point)

    The capacity to use spirit of the game to deal with infractions in a healthy way like discussion and handshaking and calming down is so useful and flexible, and if that were present in more situations – we would probably have fewer disrespectful actions or dangerous bids in the future, probably would have a greater impact than any type of prescriptive punishment for infractions.

    • Guest

      Some people always seem to want to place blame and then hand out the appropriate penalties. I don’t know of many players who play with perfect spirit, so judging others bad spirit can be a slippery slope. Sure a PMF or TMF or other penalty is a reminder one abused the rules, but is it a solution? Aren’t players still pushing or abusing the rules?

      (Just because one receives a speeding ticket doesn’t mean one will slow down next time, but I believe teaching the consequences of the inappropriate action and suggesting an alternative beneficial approach can lead to changing the behaviour).

      I would like to suggest another approach to dealing with how we play.
      We practice everything else, so why not practice playing with spirit. When a situation with bad spirited play takes place, it is an opportunity for us to teach how to properly handle the situation next time. The more we can do this the more likely it is we will eliminate the unwanted behaviour.

      We train physically to preform at the highest levels, so why not train our minds as well. Train ourselves to play with genuine spirit always, even with a chance at the Gold Medal on the line.

      I think we also need to remind everyone, and emphasize, that it is each person’s personal responsibility to govern our own actions and play with spirit. All other players are trusting we will do so.

      I look to the veterans and experienced players at the highest levels to set the example for us. Spirit is a guiding principle of our game and I believe something well worth maintaining and promoting.

      “There’s a saying that Ultimate doesn’t build character; it reveals character”
      Jim Parinella, 5 times UPA Open Champion with DoG; quote, circa 2000, USA Today.

      BE CALM; Breath, Explain, Consider, Ask, Listen, Make the call.

  • gunbutt

    Once again, Ultiworld misses the point, with a blind, pro-ref, pro ‘future of the sport’ argument that assumes pro leagues are going to be a panacea for everything ‘wrong’ with ultimate.

    If you think that the take-away from the Spike incident is that dangerous plays can only be stopped with Refs, and that Refs will be successful in keeping us safe forever and always, you ignore Boca’s main point that for the rest of the game, both teams played physically, but without further flair-up, without injuries, and then went on to play again the next day with the same result.

    The player made a dangerous bid, there were some silly over-reactions, players and coaches worked it out, end of problem. Unless, if in your head, the problem is any dangerous bid, ever, in every game of ultimate. In which case, i hope your ref solution involves them carrying big shields and getting safely in the way of any potentially dangerous contact.

    • http://www.ultiworld.com/ Charlie Eisenhood

      I would hope that it is clear from the article that I fully believe there will be dangerous bids — it happens. The point is that there should be stricter, consistently-applied penalties for such bids. Nowhere do I argue that we need to have refs.

      I would love to see all serious tournaments observed, but the logistical challenges are probably too great right now for that to be realistic. So, as I argue above, we have to find a way to police the unobserved tournaments better, so that you can’t just get away with flagrant fouls and unsportsmanlike conduct.

  • Worst Observer in Ultimate

    Stop calling it a dangerous bid. It wasn’t.

    Thank you,
    -Ariel Jackson

    • this guy

      Thank you.

  • http://twitter.com/UltiCraig Craig Stephen

    Craig Stephen • a few seconds ago

    Some people always seem to want to place blame and then hand out the appropriate penalties. I don’t know of many players who play with perfect spirit, so judging others bad spirit can be a slippery slope. Sure a PMF or TMF or other penalty is a reminder one abused the rules, but is it a solution? Aren’t players still pushing or abusing the rules?

    (Just because one receives a speeding ticket doesn’t mean one will slow down next time, but I believe teaching the consequences of the inappropriate action and suggesting an alternative beneficial approach can lead to changing the behaviour).

    I would like to suggest another approach to dealing with how we play.
    We practice everything else, so why not practice playing with spirit. When a situation with bad spirited play takes place, it is an opportunity for us to teach how to properly handle the situation next time. The more we can do this the more likely it is we will eliminate the unwanted behaviour.

    We train physically to preform at the highest levels, so why not train our minds as well. Train ourselves to play with genuine spirit always, even with a chance at the Gold Medal on the line.

    I think we also need to remind everyone, and emphasize, that it is each person’s personal responsibility to govern our own actions and play with spirit. All other players are trusting we will do so.

    I look to the veterans and experienced players at the highest levels to set the example for us. Spirit is a guiding principle of our game and I believe something well worth maintaining and promoting.

    “There’s a saying that Ultimate doesn’t build character; it reveals character”
    Jim Parinella, 5 times UPA Open Champion with DoG; quote, circa 2000, USA Today.

    BE CALM; Breath, Explain, Consider, Ask, Listen, Make the call.

Find us on Twitter
Recent Comments
Find us on Facebook