How would you change timeouts?
March 15, 2019 by Charlie Eisenhood in Opinion with 0 comments
The Mailbag is now for subscribers only. That’s going to do a few things: it will keep me committed to writing it every week. It will reward subscribers with a weekly column they can count on. And it will allow us to offer a free one-month Mini subscription for the best email or comment we get and publish in the Mailbag. If you’re already a subscriber, you get a free extra month (or a discount). If you’re not, you can come in and check out the benefits.
You can email me anytime at firstname.lastname@example.org with questions, comments, ideas — whatever you’ve got.
Q: On a recent episode of Deep Look, you mentioned prospective new rules for timeouts. Here is the best reason to not allow for substitutions, resetting the stall count, etc. Ultimate is already dominated by offense; we do not need any more benefits (and I’m an O-line handler myself). High level ultimate needs turnovers, like grass tennis needs breaks of serve.
You maybe right about substitutions creating more breaks, but it also increases the specialization of players. Not sure I like that. It feels like a get-out-of-jail-free card to allow you to have players that are just crazy athletic but cannot throw a disc.
Mailbag: Timeout Rule Changes, Machine To Semis?, Statkeeping Questions is only available to Ultiworld Subscribers
Already have a subscription? Sign In
Whether you visit Ultiworld for our reporting, our podcasts, or our video coverage, you can help us continue to provide high quality content with a subscription. By becoming a subscriber, not only do you receive benefits like exclusive articles and ad removal, you also help fund all of Ultiworld's coverage in general. We appreciate your support!